{"id":1524,"date":"2016-07-26T14:07:18","date_gmt":"2016-07-26T18:07:18","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.musingsbymichael.com\/blog\/?p=1524"},"modified":"2016-07-26T16:16:39","modified_gmt":"2016-07-26T20:16:39","slug":"wikileaks-strikes-again","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.musingsbymichael.com\/blog\/2016\/07\/26\/wikileaks-strikes-again\/","title":{"rendered":"WikiLeaks strikes again!"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"I<\/a><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

WikiLeaks<\/a> strikes again and knocks out the Democratic Chairwoman, Debbie Wasserman Schultz; she became the lighting rod of displeasure for the party\u2019s horrendous bias. Does this mean that Hillary was unfairly chosen as the Party\u2019s choice for President?<\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Well from what WikiLeaks posted, almost 20,000 emails and about 8,000 attachments sent or received from top Democratic officials the emails seem to suggest that the committee\u2019s chairwoman, Represenative Debbie Wasserman Schultz and other higher ups unfairly tried to influence the primaries out comes to tip toward Hillary Clinton\u2019s favor. The hacking group, WikiLeaks, has dubbed this document dump the \u201cHillary Leaks series.\u201d And Republican Presidential candidate Donald Trump said of this on Saturday morning, via Twitter- \u201cLeaked e-mails of DNC show plans to destroy Bernie Sanders. Mock his heritage and much more.<\/em>\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Bernie Sanders has stated that he thought the primaries might have been rigged, but he had no proof of any wrong doing. To me it seems that the primary system was tampered with and the outcome of Hillary getting the required number of delegates now seems to be very suspect. Now this will be just another thing that makes both Hillary Clinton and the DNC look like bad. Plus how can anyone truly say that Hillary deserves to be the Presidential candidate for the Democratic Party when hanky panky took place.<\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

The leaks, which are from the period of January 2015 to May 2016, are supposed to have come the from accounts of seven DNC officials and they feature conversations by staffers debating everything from how to deal with media requests to syncing the party\u2019s message with interest groups in Washington. If the emails are real, then the primary process has been tainted and why should we the voting public believe that our votes really count?<\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\u00a0I can understand how Bernie Sanders supporters are protesting at the convention occurring this week in Philadelphia. They have real grievances and of course they will probably never ever be addressed and just swept under the proverbial rug. But Hillary must realize that her nomination is now tainted to some degree and it will never go away.<\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

By now you might be curious as to what WikiLeaks has released, so here is a link to the so called Hillary Leaks series<\/a>. Have fun reading them and remember that if they are real, that means that Hillary might not have won the party\u2019s nomination. What ammunition WikiLeaks has given the Republicans and Donald Trump!<\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

So now the real fun begins and who will be shown to be the truth teller and who is the liar? Only time will tell.<\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

That is my opinion- Jumpin Jersey Mike<\/span><\/p>\n